Scientific consultation and guidance. Evaluation criteria associated with the program work

Scientific consultation and guidance. Evaluation criteria associated with the program work

The systematic manager regarding the program work is appointed because of the Department of Sociology, targeting the product range of medical http://customwriting.org/ passions of teachers and the amount of scholastic training load.

The primary tasks associated with the manager

The task that is main of manager – advising and monitoring the entire process of utilization of pupil coursework.

The obligations regarding the supervisor include:

– support in seeking the subject regarding the program work and also the development of the work plan;

– conducting consultations that are systematic the pupil on problems of work;

– support into the range of research techniques;

– advising the pupil in the choice of resources of literary works and factual product;

– monitoring the progress of work with accordance utilizing the founded plan and intermediate official certification of this pupil;

– work assessment.

Evaluation criteria associated with program work

The criteria that are main the evaluation of coursework consist of:

– the correctness for the reported function and goals for the work and The content to their compliance regarding the work;

– freedom of this writer’s method of the disclosure for the topic, such as the formula and reason of his approach that is own to research issues;

– persistence and presentation that is structured of material, such as thequality of the conclusion and introduction, the connection and continuity Between the right areas of the task, between your theoretical and practical components of the analysis;

– the caliber of the analysis additionally the capacity to utilize the types of systematic research, such as the quality of analysis for sale in the literature methods to the research regarding the dilemmas in mind;

– The practical importance of the program work, such as the connection of theoretical positions considered in the ongoing work, with repetition;

– the correctness associated with usage of sources, including conformity using the guidelines for compiling a listing of recommendations;

– conformity utilizing the coursework design demands, accuracy of design, the lack of spelling and errors that are grammatical the written text (especially whenever utilizing unique terminology);

– the contribution that is personal of author into the analysis and research of the subject.

Conformity aided by the guidelines of research ethics

While preparing a program work, unique attention is compensated to pupils’ conformity because of the guidelines of research ethics. In no full instance should plagiarism, falsification of information and « false quoting » be properly used.

Even as we mention plagiarism, we suggest direct borrowing without appropriate references to any printed or electronic sources, previously defended last qualifying works, master’s and dissertations that are doctoral.

As soon as we state the falsification of information, we suggest up to a fake or replace the supply data to be able to show the correctness of this summary (confirmation associated with theory, etc.), along with the use that is deliberate of false data as a foundation for analysis.

False quote means the presence of links towards the supply if the offered source will not include such information or suggests a page that is invalid.

Detection of ethical breaches contributes to evaluation that is poor.

The breakthrough among these violations of expert ethics may be the foundation for bringing down markings for program work, as much as grading « unsatisfactory ».

Course tasks are ranked on a scale that is five-point. The supervisor evaluates the work taking into consideration the quality of this text (for example. its content, logic and argumentation), the theoretical and methodological degree of work, plus the completeness associated with the supply database. Along with the knowledge and use of the literary works on the subject, the correctness for the formula and solution regarding the research issue, the legitimacy and legitimacy of this conclusions work, the design that is correct of work, plus the quality of message during the protection as well as the capacity to lead a medical discussion.